Scarlett Johansson Clears the Air on Disney Dispute and Dishes on AI Concerns

Share:

Scarlett Johansson recently shared with The New York Times her feelings about the past legal confrontation with Disney concerning the release strategy of her film, ‘Black Widow’. The movie was released simultaneously in theaters and on Disney+ during the pandemic, contrary to her exclusive theatrical release contract. Johansson, who expected the movie to premiere only in cinemas, sued Disney as this dual release strategy potentially cut her earnings significantly. Despite the heated lawsuit, Johansson holds no resentment towards Disney. She expressed her disappointment over what she described as unprofessional management during that period.

The actress also opened up about another controversial issue involving OpenAI. Earlier this year, a dispute arose when OpenAI used a voice resembling hers for the ChatGPT voice system, Sky, after she had declined to collaborate with the company. Johansson was quite upset, stating that OpenAI’s decision to use a similar voice without her consent crossed a line. OpenAI later removed the voice, clarifying that it belonged to another actress, but the incident had already sparked significant backlash.

Johansson humorously suggested that Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, could be a good fit for a Marvel villain, perhaps with a ‘robotic arm’. Beyond her jests, she expressed a deep concern about the broader implications of AI technology on privacy and consent, describing it as a ‘dark wormhole’ of potential misuse, particularly highlighting the issues of deepfakes and the replication of individuals’ identities online.

Additionally, Johansson touched on her personal reasons for rejecting OpenAI’s offer initially, citing her desire to protect her family’s privacy and her fundamental values.

Currently, Johansson is promoting her new romantic-comedy, ‘Fly Me to the Moon’, and is working on the latest ‘Jurassic World’ film in Thailand. Her experiences with Disney and OpenAI have evidently given her a cautious stance on how technology and contractual agreements intersect with personal rights and professional relationships.

Have something to add? Let us know in the comments below!